Salman Khan House Firing Case: Bombay High Court finds no basis against police after Anuj Thapan’s custodial death

by

As a lifestyle expert with extensive experience in navigating complex situations and understanding the nuances of justice, I find myself deeply saddened by the unfortunate events surrounding Anuj Thapan’s death. However, after carefully reviewing the details presented in this case, it appears that the Bombay High Court has taken an unbiased approach in its investigation, focusing on facts rather than emotions.

It was reported that Anuj Thapan, a suspect in the April 14 shooting close to Salman Khan’s residence in Bandra, tragically lost his life while under police supervision. On Friday, the Bombay High Court found no substantial proof to back allegations of police misconduct regarding his passing.

According to PTI, a court document dated October 25 showed that a magistrate had submitted a report after conducting an investigation under section 176 (1-A) of the CrPC. Upon examining the results, the judges stated that there was no evidence suggesting Anuj Thapan’s death in custody was due to police actions, contrary to earlier accusations.

Upon examining the findings, I, as a lifestyle expert, found myself questioning the rationale presented by advocate Nishant Rana regarding the assertion that the authorities would focus on an individual who was not even the primary suspect in the case. It’s crucial to remember that the 18-year-old, who was neither the gunman nor engaged in any activity at the time of the incident, posed no immediate danger or threat.

When the attorney claimed that the deceased was robust in body, the judges countered by pointing out that being physically fit doesn’t necessarily mean having strong mental resilience. They emphasized that it’s difficult for anyone to fully grasp the complex situations that may have driven him to such an extreme action.

The judges pointed out that many factors could contribute to such actions, including financial stress, such as the burden of lawyers’ fees, especially considering he was from outside Maharashtra. They emphasized that there are often unknown factors at play in such situations.

Justice Chavan explained to Rana that the security camera recordings didn’t reveal any signs of someone accompanying the deceased to the restroom, making it unlikely. Additionally, he pointed out that typically, an individual would fight back or resist if there was any outside influence in such a situation.

In simpler terms, Justice Mohite-Dere suggested avoiding being influenced by feelings, understanding that a mother might harbor doubts following the loss of her child. He underscored the necessity of dealing with these feelings while also acknowledging the natural worry and sorrow a mother encounters in such a heartrending circumstance.

Additionally, the judge expressed confusion as to why the officers involved in the Salman Khan house firing case singled out a 18-year-old individual who was not the primary suspect, given that there seemed to be no justification for their actions.

The judge expressed, “We can’t understand why the police felt compelled to take the 18-year-old’s life, as he wasn’t the primary suspect in the case. Instead, he could have been a valuable source of information about what transpired. He had the potential to become an informant. There appears to be no irregularities here. Review the report thoroughly and ensure your own consciences are clear before rendering any decision.

At the Mumbai police headquarters, Anuj Thapan was detained in the crime branch lockup. A pair of judges, Justices Revati Mohite-Dere and Prithviraj K Chavan, were reviewing a plea submitted by Rita Devi. She alleged that although there was a custodial death, the police had neglected to file a First Information Report (FIR).

She promptly asked for a police complaint filing (FIR) and demanded a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into this case. The court has set the next court date for January 24, asking Devi’s lawyer to examine the magistrate’s report before then.

On April 14th, two individuals riding a motorcycle discharged weapons outside the home of actor Sikandar, located in Bandra, Mumbai. After this assault, law enforcement officials captured Vicky Gupta and Sagar Pal in Gujarat on the 14th, with Anuj Thapan being detained in Punjab on April 26th.

Read More

2024-12-07 14:18