Sean Connerys Goldfinger Is Great, and Roger Ebert Gave It a Perfect Score

Sean Connerys Goldfinger Is Great, and Roger Ebert Gave It a Perfect Score

Quick Links

  • Goldfinger Should Have Aged Poorly
  • What Makes Sean Connery’s Portrayal of James Bond So Iconic?
  • Why Is Goldfinger the Most Iconic Bond Movie?

As a film enthusiast who’s spent countless hours watching movies from the Golden Age of Hollywood to the present day, I can confidently say that Goldfinger stands out as one of the most iconic Bond films ever made. Having grown up in the 60s, I vividly remember the thrill and excitement this movie sparked in cinemas across the globe.


Despite ongoing discussions about who plays James Bond best, Sean Connery’s portrayal of the martini-loving spy is undeniably the most emblematic. The suave and charismatic 007 first appeared in his hands, and his role in Goldfinger remains the epitome of the character. Regardless of how modernized Daniel Craig’s interpretation has been, Goldfinger continues to be the defining Bond for several reasons. James Bond is known for his smooth-talking and gadget-filled escapades, and Connery’s portrayal has endured as the most universally appealing.

Goldfinger offers a captivating glimpse into 1960s spy movie culture, showcasing the unique ways actors compensated for limited visual effects. The casual sexism and the nonchalant way they deliver the name Pussy Galore are part of its charm, making it a timeless adventure that may appear somewhat outdated in terms of modern filmmaking methods but still holds appeal due to its subtle allure. Each portrayal of Bond represents societal ideals of masculinity at the time, and Sean Connery’s effortless interpretation of the character is effective because he does it so convincingly.

“Goldfinger” endures through the years due to its unique cultural nuances, not because they date it. What keeps this film relevant even after so many decades? Why doesn’t it succumb to age like many other action movies? How did Connery influence the James Bond series? Here are some key points to consider.

Goldfinger Should Have Aged Poorly

Despite its questionable portrayals of sexism and stereotypes that might be seen as offensive by today’s standards, the 1964 film Goldfinger continues to captivate audiences. Sean Connery’s portrayal of James Bond in this movie is iconic, setting the standard for how we perceive the character, regardless of subsequent interpretations. Goldfinger not only set a benchmark for spy movies but also created a unique, unparalleled style that remains influential today. Its timeless charm, rooted in its groundbreaking genre-shifting, is what keeps it relevant even with its outdated attitudes.

Goldfinger manages to strike a balance between its over-the-top and self-aware elements, making it work brilliantly. The blend of sophistication and controlled action in Goldfinger prevents it from veering away from its humorous tone. As Roger Ebert aptly put in his four-star review, the enduring quality of Bond as a character that continually evolves is what keeps him going strong. Ebert used the term “formula,” which might seem limiting for other franchises, but for James Bond, it’s the very thing that has been consistently utilized. The ability to adapt the formula set by Goldfinger hasn’t always resulted in exceptional films, but it has maintained a consistent franchise continuity that seldom strays from its established path because Goldfinger laid that foundation. Ebert stated:

“Of all the Bonds, “Goldfinger” (1964) is the best, and can stand as a surrogate for the others. If it is not a great film, it is a great entertainment, and contains all the elements of the Bond formula that would work again and again. It’s also interesting as the link between the more modest first two Bonds and the later big-budget extravaganzas; after this one, producers Albert “Cubby” Broccoli and Harry Saltzman could be certain that 007 was good for the long run.”

What Makes Sean Connery’s Portrayal of James Bond So Iconic?

Sean Connerys Goldfinger Is Great, and Roger Ebert Gave It a Perfect ScoreSean Connerys Goldfinger Is Great, and Roger Ebert Gave It a Perfect ScoreSean Connerys Goldfinger Is Great, and Roger Ebert Gave It a Perfect ScoreSean Connerys Goldfinger Is Great, and Roger Ebert Gave It a Perfect Score

In essence, different spies may have varying traits, but the suave and sophisticated style portrayed by Sean Connery in his role as Bond set a standard for other actors who later donned the tuxedo. Analyzing Connery’s Bond, especially in a film like Goldfinger, is challenging because he manages to convey so much with minimal actions. Leading a movie is one thing, but carrying the entire cinematic universe of a film on your shoulders is an entirely different skill set.

In a fresh twist, Connery channeled the charm of classic movie heroes and infused it with something novel. These characters from the 1940s and 1950s often harbored a subtle weakness. They would ultimately prevail, yet it was an era where the human flaws of men were beginning to surface subtly on screen. Beneath their suave dialogue and sharp suits, absolute control for these male characters wasn’t always guaranteed. Unlike traditional portrayals, Connery’s Bond didn’t exude superhuman qualities; instead, he embodied a man who maintained control but was never invincible, thanks to his average build and hairy chest.

Why Is Goldfinger the Most Iconic Bond Movie?

Sean Connerys Goldfinger Is Great, and Roger Ebert Gave It a Perfect ScoreSean Connerys Goldfinger Is Great, and Roger Ebert Gave It a Perfect ScoreSean Connerys Goldfinger Is Great, and Roger Ebert Gave It a Perfect ScoreSean Connerys Goldfinger Is Great, and Roger Ebert Gave It a Perfect Score

Sean Connery’s portrayal of James Bond in Goldfinger appears more intricate than initially perceived, as he skillfully improvises throughout the film. This complexity transcends mere timing and involves a subtlety that significantly alters the narrative. Despite its ties to 1960s societal structures, the movie’s success lies primarily in its meticulous execution. Compared to later installments, Goldfinger is relatively brief and less action-oriented. Instead, it feels more like a well-executed espionage mission, giving the impression of a contained operation rather than a series of fights. The film is characterized by its professionalism, elegance, and concise storytelling.

Goldfinger will continue to be a film rooted in the cultural era of the 1960s and a movie that is continually reshaped without being duplicated. It’s rare for a film that earns the title of a classic within its genre to be successfully replicated, but this is the case with Goldfinger. Its unique portrayal of a new-wave action hero, blended seamlessly with the sophisticated aesthetics of the 1960s, has set it as the standard for Bond films that will remain unmatched. The appeal of Goldfinger lies in its distinctive blend of cultural influence and creative innovation, which guides it while defining its enduring cinematic legacy. By the way, you can stream Goldfinger on Prime Video.

Read More

Sorry. No data so far.

2024-11-11 03:31