SEC charges NovaTech over $650m crypto fraud

As a seasoned analyst with over three decades of experience in finance and regulatory compliance, I have seen my fair share of financial misconduct. In light of the recent SEC charges against NovaTech for crypto fraud, it is clear that while the regulator plays a crucial role in detecting and preventing such activities, it’s essential to address the broader issue at hand.


A little-known cryptocurrency trading company based in the United States is facing charges from the Securities and Exchange Commission for allegedly deceiving approximately 200,000 investors globally.

In their ongoing efforts against cryptocurrency scams, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has taken action against NovaTech, its leadership, and associated promoters. This action stems from a multi-level marketing fraud involving digital assets which amassed approximately $650 million in value.

In the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, a lawsuit has been submitted, accusing Cynthia and Eddy Petion of running a fraudulent cryptocurrency investment scheme over a four-year period through NovaTech. The operation, active from 2019 to 2023, led the Petions to make promises of immediate profits to investors and assure them that their initial investments were secure.

As reported by the SEC, the pair is said to have enlisted a team of promoters such as Martin Zizi, Dapilinu Dunbar, James Corbett, Corrie Sampson, John Garofano, and Marsha Hadley, to assist in carrying out their alleged fraudulent activities. Subsequently, NovaTech stands accused of stealing vast amounts of investors’ cryptocurrencies, ultimately halting all withdrawals.

In Eric Werner’s words from the SEC’s Fort Worth Regional Office, speaking on Aug. 12, “We assert that such large Multi-Level Marketing (MLM) operations necessitate individuals to keep them running. Today’s action proves that we won’t only target the main architects of these extensive schemes, but also those who assist by illegally recruiting victims through their deceptive solicitation.”

Is the SEC partly to blame for crypto fraud?

This was the second U.S. watchdog to sue NovaTech over crypto fraud. In June, New York Attorney General Letitia James also accused the trading firm and its principles of masterminding a criminal operation.

In response to the news, Bill Hughes, an attorney at ConsenSys, raised the point that perhaps such a situation could have been prevented if there were clear regulations in place and cryptocurrency service providers were given the opportunity to be registered based on their quality and merit.

Critics often criticize the securities regulator for its “enforcement-focused” strategy towards digital assets, with proponents such as chairman Gary Gensler maintaining that the majority of cryptocurrencies are subject to federal securities regulations.

As a crypto investor, I’ve noticed a significant disagreement among the community, leading to multiple court battles. Companies like Coinbase and Ripple have found themselves at the heart of these legal disputes.

It’s certain that the NY Attorney General has already filed a lawsuit against Novatech founders. If the accusations are true, it seems reasonable that the Department of Justice might indict them. However, such a case is one where it would be difficult for anyone to argue against the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) getting involved as well.

— Bill Hughes : wchughes.eth 🦊 (@BillHughesDC) August 12, 2024

Read More

2024-08-12 21:25