As a seasoned analyst with over two decades of experience in financial markets, I have seen my fair share of regulatory battles and evolutions. The ongoing saga between the SEC and Binance is reminiscent of a classic cat-and-mouse game, where both parties seem to be taking turns in setting new rules and challenging the status quo.
In simpler terms, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has expanded its legal action against the well-known cryptocurrency trading platform, Binance.
The ongoing legal proceedings now encompass additional cryptocurrencies, such as Axie Infinity (AXS), Filecoin (FIL), Cosmos (ATOM), The Sandbox (SAND), and Decentraland (MANA). This action signifies the Securities and Exchange Commission’s continued efforts to govern the crypto market by labeling various digital assets as securities.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has accused Binance and its U.S. affiliate, BAM Trading, of facilitating transactions involving securities that have recently been classified in an updated lawsuit. According to the regulatory body, Binance’s platforms are alleged to have disseminated a large amount of promotional material from promoters and issuers, making these tokens appear as attractive investment opportunities.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) intends to ensure proper governance and compliance in the crypto industry, and this particular action is part of that larger strategy.
In their latest announcement, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) asserts that Binance lacks the necessary licensing to function as a clearing agency, broker, or trading platform in the U.S. The regulatory body argues that Binance has not been transparent about the risks and legal status of the tokens traded on its global and American platforms. Additionally, the SEC alleges that Binance illegally used interstate commerce channels to facilitate securities transactions for others.
This legal expansion has drawn criticism for the SEC’s regulatory stance. Recent criticism has increased with the SEC’s acknowledgment that the term “crypto asset security” is problematic, leading to claims of regulatory inconsistencies.
Stuart Alderoty, Ripple‘s top legal executive, criticized the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for presenting conflicting accusations, zeroing in particularly on the peculiarities uncovered within the revised lawsuit.
Paul Grewal, legal chief at Coinbase, has highlighted inconsistencies in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) stance on certain matters. He raised doubts about the SEC’s earlier classification of XRP as a security during its 2020 lawsuit against Ripple, implying that these changing positions could potentially confuse judges and investors.
The constant discussions about laws and regulations surrounding cryptocurrencies are continually influencing how these digital currencies are regulated and enforced.
Read More
Sorry. No data so far.
2024-09-13 20:04