As a lifelong enthusiast of science fiction, particularly the timeless series “Doctor Who”, I find myself deeply intrigued by the recent opinions expressed by its esteemed showrunner, Steven Moffat, regarding AI generative technology. While his views may appear somewhat unusual to some, they resonate profoundly with my own experiences and understanding of the creative process.
Previously in charge of the “Doctor Who” TV series, renowned showrunner Steven Moffat has shared his thoughts on AI generative technology. Despite “Doctor Who” being known for portraying advanced tech from the future, Moffat firmly criticized the integration of AI in television and cinema. He believes that people are a more cost-effective option, and as AI becomes more widespread, it’s more likely to malfunction.
Many celebrities have voiced concerns about AI, considering it questionable at its best and potentially harmful at its worst. However, Steven Moffat’s perspective offers a slightly distinct yet equally valid viewpoint. In an interview with Radio Times alongside fellow Doctor Who writer Russell T. Davies on the rising trend of generative AI, Moffat acknowledged his fascination with the technology but primarily criticized its cost, suggesting that it could be more economical to have humans handle the tasks instead.
“It takes an immense amount of power to run AI. Whereas you can run a human being on sunlight and a vegetable patch.”
Although Moffat’s assertion might seem unusual, it’s not inherently false – an individual AI model could potentially consume vast amounts of electricity over thousands of hours, and produce hundreds of tons of carbon dioxide in a relatively brief period, which is significantly more than the typical energy usage and carbon footprint of an average person.
Human beings are amazingly cheap, we’re knocking out human beings every day.
In addition to his criticism, Moffat commented on the lack of originality in AI technology, likening it to this: “‘As more data is generated by AI, it begins to assimilate that information, leading to a cycle where it regurgitates its own content.’
Despite the growing use of AI among the public, Davies expressed a more hopeful perspective, suggesting that creatives seldom employ it to generate ideas for television series or films. Instead, he stated, “The number of innovative ideas on television is greater than we typically acknowledge,” adding that “there’s something brilliant on TV every day.
Interestingly, the two writers’ contrasting viewpoints appear to mirror their distinct periods as showrunners of Doctor Who, with Davies renowned for creating lighter episodes and more optimistic conclusions, while Moffat is often associated with the heart-wrenching demise of beloved characters.
Generative AI Technology Has Been Criticized By Majority of Hollywood
Even though Moffat and Davies might seem unusual in their criticism of generative AI, they are by no means alone among celebrities who voice disapproval towards this emerging technology. Renowned filmmakers such as James Cameron, Christopher Nolan, and Guillermo del Toro have also expressed their opposition to AI, arguing that it is ethically questionable, potentially dangerous, and disrespectful to “authentic art.
Currently, SAG-AFTRA is bringing together numerous celebrities with the aim of creating safeguards that prevent artificial intelligence from duplicating their likeness without their explicit approval. This topic has become a significant concern due to ongoing legal disputes involving deceased actors like Peter Cushing, where AI usage has been at issue. As AI technology advances and becomes more widespread, criticisms against it appear to intensify.
I’m thrilled to bits that the future of “Doctor Who” appears secure under Russell T. Davies’ skilled guidance, with his upcoming Christmas special, “Joy to the World,” promising an escape from contemporary tech woes. Here’s hoping this holiday adventure starring the 15th Doctor (Ncuti Gatwa) and Nicola Coughlan as they explore a time hotel filled with Christmas Days from history, offers a delightful respite!
Read More
Sorry. No data so far.
2024-12-08 03:03