The Real Reason Temple Of Doom Is An Indiana Jones Prequel, Not A Sequel

The Real Reason Temple Of Doom Is An Indiana Jones Prequel, Not A Sequel

As a gamer with a keen interest in film history, I find myself constantly amazed by the intricacies of the Indiana Jones franchise. The decision to make “Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom” a prequel rather than a sequel is an interesting one, to say the least.


Regarding the thrilling escapades of Dr. Jones, portrayed by Harrison Ford, there are no boundaries set. This flexibility extends to the chronology of Indiana Jones’ adventures, particularly “Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom.” In this sequel, directed by Steven Spielberg and co-created by George Lucas, they have Indiana Jones fleeing from Shanghai initially, only to land in the Indian village of Mayapore. Here, he encounters a cult that abducts children, which serves as his adversary. Interestingly, this film is set in 1935, a year prior to the events depicted in “Raiders of the Lost Ark.” This change in timeline doesn’t affect the overall narrative of the franchise, but why did the filmmakers opt for it? According to Lucas and Spielberg, they wanted to introduce a fresh villain for our intrepid archaeologist.

Discussing the 1984 movie “Indiana Jones,” Lucas shared his reasoning for replacing Nazis with an old civilization in the story. He stated, “We decided to make ‘Temple of Doom’ a prequel since we didn’t want to stick with the same antagonists. We had concepts about the Monkey King.” The path to Mayapore was a challenging one, as the initial plan involved a haunted house setting, but this idea was discarded when Spielberg rejected it, as he had previously worked on “Poltergeist.” However, in retrospect, this film seems to have aged the most poorly, and even its director doesn’t hold it in high regard.

Temple of Doom was a trial in darkness for Steven Spielberg

The Real Reason Temple Of Doom Is An Indiana Jones Prequel, Not A Sequel

Looking back at all the thrilling escapades of Indiana Jones, it’s clear that “Temple of Doom” has grown increasingly questionable as time passes. This ’80s classic hasn’t weathered the test of time gracefully, featuring a white protagonist delving into an exotic land rich with mysticism, voodoo, and monkey brains. While Indy is knowledgeable about the culture and seemingly progressive for his era, the climax sees him battling against a stereotypical villain, who ironically, is a white actor named Nizwar Karani in blackface. In hindsight, even the great Steven Spielberg acknowledged that the outcome didn’t meet his own high standards.

In an interview with The Sun Sentinel, the director expressed his dissatisfaction with the second film, stating it was excessively dark, underground, and extremely horrific, even surpassing the terror in ‘Poltergeist.’ He felt that none of himself was reflected in ‘Temple of Doom.’ Remarkably, during film production, he encountered his future spouse Kate Capshaw, who played Willie Scott. In 2012, Spielberg told Empire that “Temple of Doom” served as a valuable learning experience for him to fully immerse myself in darkness. Upon emerging from the shadows, he found the light of the woman he was destined to marry and start a family with.

Read More

Sorry. No data so far.

2024-11-04 04:59