WazirX, Laminal Custody playing Blame Game for $230M Hack

As a seasoned analyst with extensive experience in the crypto industry, I can’t help but feel a sense of unease and frustration over the recent hacking incident involving WazirX and Liminal Custody. The theft of $230 million worth of digital assets is an alarming reminder of the vulnerabilities that exist within our burgeoning digital economy.


Yesterday’s shocking $230 million cryptocurrency heist involving WazirX and Liminal Custody has brought to light a deep-rooted dispute between the two firms responsible for securing digital assets. The incident has left the community reeling, as users seek clarification on who is accountable for this major breach.

WazirX asserts that an attack occurred on a multi-signature wallet they utilized from Liminal Custody’s services. A multi-sig wallet is a secure storage method where transactions necessitate approval from multiple parties. However, according to WazirX, there was a mismatch between the information shown on Liminal’s interface and the genuine details of the transaction, enabling attackers to exploit this disparity and pilfer the funds.

The ongoing dispute between Liminal Custody and WazirX over the recent hack has left users in a state of uncertainty. While Liminal Custody has not provided specifics about the exploit, they have counter-claimed that three WazirX wallets were breached prior to the attack. This back-and-forth raises questions about who is responsible for the stolen funds and whether affected users will be compensated.

Based on reports from cryptocurrency analysts such as zackXBT and cybersecurity firms like Elliptic, there are suspicions among security professionals that the hack could be linked to North Korean cybercriminals. This occurrence underscores increasing apprehensions about the safety of digital assets and the potential hazards presented by third-party custodians.

The two firms remain firmly rooted in their stances, leaving it uncertain how WazirX will navigate this predicament or if they will reimburse users for any incurred losses. This occurrence brings significant concerns about transparency and responsibility within the cryptocurrency sector. Indian regulatory authorities may need to intervene to safeguard users and prevent such incidents from recurring in the future.

Read More

2024-07-19 18:29