18 States Sue SEC and Gary Gensler Over Crypto Regulation

As a seasoned analyst with over two decades of experience in the financial industry and a keen interest in cryptocurrencies, I find myself closely following the escalating legal battle between the U.S. states and the SEC. Having witnessed similar power struggles between regulators and emerging industries in the past, I can’t help but draw parallels.


18 U.S. states such as Nebraska, Texas, and Ohio have initiated a legal action against the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and its leader, Gary Gensler. The states allege that the SEC has exceeded its jurisdiction by assuming regulatory power over cryptocurrencies without obtaining approval from Congress first.

The legal action spearheaded by states such as Nebraska, Tennessee, Texas, and Ohio alleges that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has circumvented Congress and sought to usurp state regulatory authority via its enforcement measures.

The Blockchain Association points out that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s lawsuits against cryptocurrency firms have resulted in $426 million being spent on legal fees since 2021. Crypto industry leaders often express their disapproval towards the SEC due to a perceived lack of clear and consistent policy, which they argue is hindering innovation within the U.S.

In anticipation of shifts in power following the 2024 elections, investors are expressing optimism for potential changes at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The tenure of current SEC leader Gary Gensler has faced criticism, and one of the names being mentioned as a possible successor is Commissioner Mark Uyeda. Known for his opposition to Gensler’s enforcement-focused strategy, Uyeda is among those being considered as a replacement.

Regardless of the mounting demands, Gensler continues to hold strong in his position. In a speech given in November 2024, he reemphasized his apprehensions concerning cryptocurrencies. He pointed out that while certain assets are speculative or linked with illegal activities, many have yet to demonstrate their worth for long-term utility.

The persistent court case highlights the strain between rule-makers and the rapidly expanding cryptocurrency sector. Both investors and innovators are eagerly awaiting more definite guidelines to encourage advancement and expansion within the American cryptocurrency market.

Read More

2024-11-15 08:52