Decentralized science is modernizing outdated systems | Opinion

As a crypto investor with an interest in decentralized technologies and their potential impact on various industries, I’m excited about the emergence of decentralized science (DeSci) as it promises to modernize and democratize scientific research. Having witnessed firsthand the challenges faced by researchers in securing funding and publishing their findings, I can relate to the frustration and inefficiencies that plague today’s academic systems.


As a crypto investor with an interest in technology and innovation, I’ve long admired the power of the scientific method. For centuries, it has led us to groundbreaking theories and practical inventions that have transformed our world. However, I can’t help but notice that the traditional structures supporting this discovery process are starting to feel outdated. Academic publication models and research funding mechanisms, in particular, are being criticized for being relics of a bygone era. It’s essential that we find new ways to foster scientific exploration and progress while ensuring transparency, accessibility, and fairness. I believe that embracing open-source research, decentralized funding models, and blockchain technology could pave the way for a more inclusive and efficient scientific community.

As a researcher exploring the cutting-edge developments in the scientific community, I’m excited about the emergence of decentralized science, or DeSci. This innovative approach to modernizing our systems holds great promise for various stakeholders in the scientific realm. By creating new channels for connection, knowledge sharing, and discovery, web3-empowered DeSci projects are working diligently to address the shortcomings of current incentive structures and foster more efficient forms of scientific progress that cater to today’s demands.

Crowd-sourced funding > institutional patronage

Consider the current academic funding system, for instance. Normally, it grants rewards based on a researcher’s ability to obtain grants instead of focusing on the significance or impact of their research findings. This tendency has had a disproportionate effect on areas like drug development, which historically have involved high costs and risks. Typically, these domains have been dominated by large corporations due to their financial resources to manage the complex and prolonged procedures.

A new generation of Decentralized Science (DeSci) platforms and autonomous organizations (DAOs), which include crowdfunding sites, has arisen to address the imbalance in research funding. These innovative solutions expand the pool of financial resources and enable community members to offer not only money but also expertise and resources to projects they support. Furthermore, advanced funding models that utilize smart contracts and tokenized rewards can link financing to project milestones and outcomes, motivating researchers to produce significant results instead of solely focusing on obtaining the next round of traditional grants or backing from large institutions.

As a crypto investor, I’m always on the lookout for innovative projects that offer unique solutions. One project that catches my attention is Molecule. This platform employs a decentralized funding model, empowering researchers to tokenize their projects and tap into a vast pool of potential investors worldwide.

Open publishing & peer review > academic gatekeepers

DeSci, which stands for Decentralized Science, aspires to enhance research funding in various ways, but that’s not its only goal. The conventional publication model has long been under fire for its inefficiencies and gatekeeping processes. Researchers often encounter significant delays between submitting a paper for publication and actually seeing it published, with peer reviews taking months or even years to complete. Moreover, access to knowledge within paywalled journals is restricted, which can hinder progress.

As a researcher deeply engaged in the world of decentralized science (DeSci), I find it truly exhilarating to witness the potential for groundbreaking advancements in knowledge-sharing and collaboration. The future of scientific publishing lies in making research data, methodologies, and outcomes readily accessible to all, thus enabling real-time peer review and collaboration. Best of all, several vibrant DeSci projects are already leading the charge on this front, offering innovative solutions for a more open and inclusive scientific community.

As an analyst, I would describe it this way: I’ve noticed projects such as ResearchHub and DeSci Labs that champion a collective approach in scientific research. They enable open publishing, encourage interactive peer reviews, and foster community-driven funding. Researchers whose work is of superior quality or who offer insightful feedback to their peers are recognized through community funding mechanisms. By doing so, they add to the shared body of knowledge accessible to all on these platforms. This model not only streamlines many hurdles in traditional research but also safeguards science as a public asset, making it more open and practical for everyone.

Collective progress > isolated innovation

As a researcher exploring the decentralized science (DeSci) landscape, I can attest that this isn’t just an abstract idea—it’s a vibrant movement generating numerous tangible advantages. The foundation of DeSci lies in a dynamic network of decentralized data repositories, publishing platforms, and research autonomous organizations (DAOs). Although blockchain-powered initiatives dominate the headlines, there are also intriguing projects at the intersection of conventional science and DeSci that experiment with innovative approaches to enhance and expedite scientific discoveries.

As a researcher, I would describe this hybrid approach by saying that tools like Research Rabbit and Open Science Framework (OSF) offer me a unique way to conduct my research. While web3 projects focus on decentralization, these platforms provide a centralized yet open environment for collaboration, documentation, and sharing of research work. With the help of these tools, I can plan, execute, document, and publish my research in an efficient and transparent manner. Additionally, their focus on data transparency and collaborative insights aligns with the broader goal of advancing scientific discovery through new forms of collaboration and knowledge sharing.

Moving away from conventional scientific approaches is an ongoing, collaborative process that doesn’t belong to any specific project category – a testament to the inherently collaborative nature of scientific discovery. Skeptics might contend that adopting DeSci means jettisoning time-tested methods. However, the intention behind DeSci isn’t to scrap traditional practices but instead to build upon them with innovative, complementary models. This approach expands the horizons for scientists and researchers, offering additional avenues for investigation and collaboration.

Meeting the needs of today’s scientific community

The scientific method flourishes by questioning assumptions, reformulating queries, and persistently striving to explore and navigate the world more effectively. This is an ongoing, adaptive approach that scrutinizes our existing knowledge and the methods we use to acquire it, expanding the limits of what we can discover. However, despite its innovative spirit, scientific research and discovery are frequently constrained by outdated frameworks for financing, disseminating results, and evaluating peer-reviewed work. To advance, we must not only solve scientific puzzles but also reinvent and enhance the structures that guide our explorations.

In the current context, decentralized science holds significant transformative power due to its capacity to shift incentives and broaden access to financing and information. The timeless maxim, “we cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them,” is particularly relevant in today’s scientific landscape. By adopting innovative DeSci approaches, both academic institutions and independent researchers can contribute to a more equitable, transparent, and dynamic scientific exploration process. As we move forward into this new phase, it is essential for the scientific community to remain receptive to the opportunities presented by decentralized science, ensuring that our pursuit of knowledge remains aligned with the demands and complexities of the present day.

Decentralized science is modernizing outdated systems | Opinion

Patrick Joyce

Patrick Joyce serves as the co-founder and COO of ResearchHub. With a background as a double dropout, he departed from a PhD program in molecular biology to pursue medical school, only to abandon medical studies in favor of establishing ResearchHub. Throughout his academic tenure, he came to recognize the deep-rooted issues with incentives in scholarly publishing, which hinder the progression of human knowledge. To address these challenges, Joyce co-founded ResearchHub, aiming to expedite scientific advancements by realigning incentives within the academic marketplace.

Read More

Sorry. No data so far.

2024-06-16 16:14