As a researcher with a background in finance and experience following regulatory developments in the crypto space, I find this new guidance from the SEC on crypto reporting for banks intriguing. The easing of requirements regarding balance sheet reporting is significant, as it could potentially open up more opportunities for financial institutions to engage in cryptocurrency services while mitigating risks.
As a crypto investor, I’m excited to hear that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued new guidelines. According to these guidelines, banks can choose not to include their customers’ cryptocurrency holdings on their balance sheets if they implement proper risk management measures. This means that banks can now provide more flexible services to their clients in the crypto space while still adhering to regulatory requirements. It’s a win-win situation for both parties involved.
The SEC, which is the securities regulatory body in the United States, has relaxed the rules requiring banks and brokerages to include cryptocurrency holdings in their balance sheets, as long as they put in place appropriate risk management strategies.
As a researcher, I’ve come across information from a Bloomberg report suggesting that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) staff are providing guidance indicating that certain arrangements may not necessitate reporting liabilities on the balance sheet. Sources familiar with the regulator’s approach have shared that some large financial lenders who have previously consulted with the SEC on this matter have received approval to bypass balance sheet reporting.
It is now crucial for them to safeguard their customers’ assets against potential bankruptcy or business failure.
As a crypto investor, I’ve noticed that back in 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) released some guidance on cryptocurrencies a few months before the unfortunate collapse of FTX, a popular crypto exchange. According to reports from Bloomberg, quoting sources privy to the SEC’s plans, this guidance was meant to help banks inform their investors about potential risks in the crypto market. However, there seems to have been some disagreement over the scope of this guidance. Financial institutions argued that wallets and Bitcoin exchange-traded products should not be subjected to the same regulations as other crypto assets.
In early March, the House Financial Services Committee considered a measure aimed at overturning a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) guideline that has hindered banks from providing cryptocurrency custody services. The proposed House resolution targeted the repeal of SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 121, which mandated banks to include their customers’ crypto assets on their balance sheets, triggering higher capital obligations and discouraging crypto-related offerings by financial institutions.
As a researcher examining this situation, I found that the House successfully passed the resolution; however, its implementation was hindered by a presidential veto. In an attempt to overturn the veto, the House tried to muster enough votes for an override, but unfortunately, they fell short of the required number, thereby maintaining the SEC’s existing guideline in effect.
Read More
- Crypto VC funding roundup: Riot snags over $594m, BVNK raises $50m
- XRP Price Eyes $2 Support Level Amidst Market Correction
- ‘Fast and Furious’ Star Paul Walker Remembered 11 Years After His Death
- 15 Charged for converting Drug Cartels’ Cash into Cryptocurrency in U.S.
- PYTH PREDICTION. PYTH cryptocurrency
- Russell T Davies Says He “Kind Of Hopes” The Streaming Bubble Will “Pop”
- TROTOAR Gallery Bridges Local and Global Art with ‘That’s What’s Up!’
- OREO Unveils Six New Products for 2025
- The Final ‘Gladiator II’ Trailer Has Arrived
- Paul Atkins to Replace Gary Gensler as Next SEC Chair?
2024-07-12 11:30