SEC Refuses Richard Heart’s Request to Dismiss $1B Lawsuit

As a seasoned crypto investor with over a decade of experience under my belt, I find myself closely following the ongoing legal tussle between Richard Heart and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Having navigated through numerous regulatory hurdles in this dynamic industry, I can’t help but empathize with Heart’s predicament.


The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has denied Richard Heart’s request to dismiss a $1 billion legal action against him. Heart, creator of Hex, argues that the SEC lacks jurisdiction over his situation and maintains that no securities transactions took place in the case.

In a recent court filing, the SEC requested the U. S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York to deny Heart’s motion. Heart, whose real identity is Richard Schueler, has been charged with securities fraud involving the sale of unregistered securities on Hex, PulseChain, and Pulse X.

The agency alleges that Heart deceptively marketed Hex as a lucrative staking platform that promised investors an additional 38% in tokens. Yet, it suspects that a large portion of the interest in Hex might have been fabricated, with 94% to 97% of the Ethereum deposited possibly being recycled back into cryptocurrency exchanges.

Heart’s argument is that because he lives abroad and his actions weren’t aimed at the United States, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) doesn’t have the authority to regulate him. However, the SEC counters that Heart’s activities in the U.S., such as advertising, provide grounds for their case.

As a crypto investor, I’m keeping a close eye on the recent development where the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has partially reversed the dismissal of a class-action suit against Binance US. This lawsuit accuses Binance US of artificially influencing the price of HEX by manipulating its market, an allegation that I, along with many others in the crypto community, find quite intriguing and potentially impactful on my investments.

As a legal analyst, I’m pointing out that the legal team for Heart is arguing the following: Hex, PulseChain, and Pulse X are classified as decentralized technologies rather than investment contracts. Consequently, these entities should not be categorized as securities according to our current understanding of financial regulations.

In simpler terms, they view Hex similarly to Bitcoin, which the SEC doesn’t consider a security. However, the SEC maintains that all of Heart’s offerings fit the description of securities according to U.S. laws.

Ben Armstrong, commonly known as BitBoy among cryptocurrency enthusiasts, backed up HEX. He pointed out that despite the legal issues facing the project’s creator, the built-in staking system has consistently proven beneficial for users of HEX.

Read More

Sorry. No data so far.

2024-08-23 09:40