SEC charges Rari Capital for misleading investors, unregistered activity

As a seasoned crypto investor with over a decade of experience navigating the volatile and often murky waters of digital assets, I can’t help but feel a mix of disillusionment and amusement at the latest news regarding Rari Capital. While it’s refreshing to see regulatory bodies like the SEC stepping up their game in the DeFi space, it’s also a stark reminder that even the most autonomous and decentralized platforms can have human elements prone to errors and misconduct.


As a researcher, I’m sharing the following information: In my findings, I discovered that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has brought charges against Rari Capital, a decentralized finance platform, and its co-founders. The SEC alleges that they deceived investors and acted as unregistered brokers, which is in violation of securities laws.

As stated in a recent announcement by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the allegations pertain to two digital asset investment platforms which, at their maximum, managed more than a billion dollars worth of cryptocurrencies.

Unregistered investments and misleading claims

It is alleged that Rari Capital, along with its co-founders Jai Bhavnani, Jack Lipstone, and David Lucid, performed unregistered securities transactions using their respective platforms, according to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC contends that Rari Capital marketed two primary investment products: Earn pools and Fuse pools.

In essence, both platforms enabled investors to store their cryptocurrency in lending pools for profit generation. Notably, the management of the Earn pools was handled by Rari, whereas the Fuse pools were designed and controlled by users as stated in the announcement.

Investors were given tokens symbolizing their shares in these groups, and occasionally they got Rari Governance Tokens (RGT) which granted them the ability to cast votes on important platform-related matters.

According to the SEC, Rari Capital misrepresented that their Earn pools would self-adjust into the most profitable cryptocurrency investments automatically. In actuality, this adjustment frequently needed human input, and at times, this oversight was overlooked, leading investors to suffer financial losses.

Furthermore, it’s alleged that Rari failed to adequately disclose fees associated with promised high yields. Consequently, numerous investors in the Earn pools experienced financial losses.

Broader implications for DeFi regulation

As a crypto investor, I’ve learned a valuable lesson from the recent challenges faced by Rari Capital: even cutting-edge DeFi platforms may find themselves under regulatory scrutiny. Despite Rari Capital’s claims of autonomy and decentralization, it seems that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is treating it similarly to any other financial entity offering investment products. This serves as a reminder that regardless of the technology or structure, compliance with regulations remains crucial in the dynamic world of crypto investments.

While others might classify a product as ‘decentralized’ and ‘autonomous’, we won’t let such labels blind us. Instead, we delve deeper into the economic truths, just as we did in this case. We will hold the creators of cryptocurrency products and platforms responsible if they cause harm to investors or breach federal securities laws.

Monique C. Winkler, Director of the SEC’s San Francisco Regional Office

In the terms of the agreement, Rari Capital and its leaders will face fines for civil offenses, and they’ll be barred from holding officer or director positions for a period of five years.

Back in 2022, the management responsibilities were transferred from Rari to Rari Capital Infrastructure. Subsequently, both parties agreed to resolve charges with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over comparable issues. Neither Rari nor its creators acknowledged the accusations, but they accepted the SEC’s conditions instead.

Read More

2024-09-18 23:07