In a recent decision, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals has partially sided with Coinbase in their lawsuit against the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This means that part of the case has been decided in favor of Coinbase.
According to Coinbase Chief Legal Officer, Paul Grewal, the court determined that the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) rejection of Coinbase’s 2022 petition for rulemaking regarding crypto and securities regulations was deemed as being “unreasonable” or without a sound basis.
2023 saw Coinbase appealing after the SEC declined their initial request for rules specifying how securities regulations pertain to digital assets, offering little insight into their decision.
In simpler terms, a group of three judges determined that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) hadn’t given enough reasons for their denial, so they instructed the SEC to go over it again in detail and explain why they made the decision they did.
As a crypto investor, I find myself compelled to urge the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for clarity in their statements. It’s disheartening to anticipate another vague explanation from them, especially when we’re already dealing with a lengthy series of unclear explanations. The recent court ruling didn’t mandate new crypto-centric rulemaking, but it did underscore the potential damage caused by regulatory ambiguity.
No clear guidance
The court additionally voiced disapproval towards the SEC for enforcing securities laws haphazardly without offering clear direction, expressing concern that such an approach could hamper innovation in the cryptocurrency field. In the court’s opinion, inconsistent application of regulations ill-suited for digital assets can impact the entire industry, potentially leading to its de facto prohibition.
Making this choice contributes to the escalating legal examination of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s viewpoint on digital assets. Courts are progressively advocating for more openness and precision in the SEC’s methodology regarding cryptocurrency governance.
We also value Judge Bibas’ agreement, where he passionately addresses the potential constitutional issues arising from enforcing rules retroactively without first establishing guidelines or principles in advance. His argument is quite compelling.
— paulgrewal.eth (@iampaulgrewal) January 13, 2025
Companies like Coinbase have consistently maintained that existing securities laws don’t fully grasp the distinct characteristics of blockchain technology, leading to complex regulatory hurdles within the crypto sector.
Last week, Coinbase was granted a chance to challenge the SEC’s claims in court, thanks to Judge Katherine Polk Failla from the Southern District of New York. She approved Coinbase’s application for an early appeal, delaying the current legal process temporarily.
A request for an interlocutory appeal gives a party the opportunity to contest a particular legal question before the whole trial is over. In this scenario, Coinbase intends to ask the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to make a decision about whether the SEC’s accusations against it are valid under existing securities regulations.
Read More
- AI16Z PREDICTION. AI16Z cryptocurrency
- POL PREDICTION. POL cryptocurrency
- Crypto ETPs hit $44.5b in YTD inflows amid Bitcoin surge
- Hong Kong Treasury says crypto is not a ‘target asset’ for its Exchange Fund
- Li Haslett Chen to Leave Warner Bros. Discovery Board
- SEN PREDICTION. SEN cryptocurrency
- Blockaid new dashboard to track Web3 activity and threats
- Shiba Inu, Bonk, Pepe prices rebound: Beware of dead cat bounce
- Springfield man is convicted for using crypto to finance ISIS operations
- US States charges ahead to adopt Bitcoin Reserve Legislation
2025-01-14 00:40