Bank of England’s PRA asks firms to disclose crypto investments

by

As a seasoned researcher with a keen interest in the intersection of finance and technology, this latest move by the Bank of England’s Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has piqued my curiosity. Having closely followed the evolving landscape of cryptoassets, I am particularly intrigued by their focus on tokenized assets and stablecoins.

The Financial Regulation Department at the Bank of England, known as the Prudential Regulation Authority, has made a data demand, requiring companies to reveal their existing and future involvement with “digital assets based on cryptography.

Companies were asked to reveal details about their present holdings and projected future investments in “digital asset holdings,” including both tokenized assets and stablecoins, as well as to describe how they implement the regulatory guidelines related to cryptocurrencies outlined in the Basel framework.

Firms have until March 24, 2025, to submit their responses. 

As a researcher, I underscore the importance of the data we gather, as it plays a crucial role in shaping our policy decisions, particularly regarding the calibration of our framework for managing exposures related to ‘cryptocurrencies’. This undertaking aligns with the international Basel guidelines, which serve as our compass in prudently handling cryptocurrency assets.

Use of tokenized assets and stablecoins 

The Bank of England is keen on exploring how companies manage the risks linked to digital assets like tokens and stablecoins, especially when they’re involved in cryptocurrency transactions.

In July, the Bank for International Settlements collaborated with the Bank of England on a trial initiative known as “Project Pyxtrial.” This project aimed to monitor the reserves associated with stablecoins. By doing so, it intended to provide regulators with almost real-time information about the liabilities and backing assets of stablecoins, using technologies for data collection, storage, and analysis.

In similar fashion, our present data gathering endeavor intends to evaluate the pros and cons of possible regulatory strategies and set a standard for tracking changes within the field, as suggested by the statement.

It’s not mandatory for every company to respond; only those with involvement in cryptocurrencies, either as exposures or activities, must supply information. However, for relevant sections of the data form, all firms are requested to submit information based on their own operations. No response is expected from companies without any exposure to these cryptocurrencies.

Read More

2024-12-13 22:42