As a seasoned crypto investor with over a decade of experience under my belt, I find myself deeply skeptical of the recent International Monetary Fund report regarding the environmental impact of Bitcoin mining. Having witnessed the rapid evolution and advancements in this field firsthand, it’s hard for me not to question the validity of such reports that seem to be based on outdated data and flawed comparisons.
A recent International Monetary Fund report claiming a surge in carbon emissions from AI and crypto usage has sparked a rebuttal from Bitcoin advocate Daniel Batten.
The proposed recommendation is for regulators to introduce a ‘cryptocurrency carbon’ tax, given the potential harm to the environment attributed to Bitcoin (BTC) mining activities.
Batten contended that the study relies on incorrect comparisons and antiquated information, furthermore, he lambasted the International Monetary Fund for employing a “blame game” approach, likening the carbon emissions from Bitcoin mining to those of AI data centers, but without recent proof to support this equivalence.
Bitcoin mining, in contrast to AI data centers, is demonstrated to contribute positively to the decarbonization of energy networks, as indicated by various studies that emphasize these distinct aspects. (Batten points out)
Over a span of four years, both the value and computational power of Bitcoin have witnessed significant growth. However, this expansion has not led to an increase in the network’s emissions. Instead, this stability indicates progress towards more energy-efficient mining practices, contradicting the widespread belief that Bitcoin’s environmental impact is continually escalating.
— da-ri (@dari_org) August 12, 2024
Bitcoin mining emissions
As a crypto investor, I too have questioned the International Monetary Fund’s reliance on questionable sources and theoretical models when assessing the environmental impact of Bitcoin mining. I firmly believe these methods can skew the accurate portrayal of the industry’s environmental footprint.
As per Batten’s findings, it’s predicted that Bitcoin’s consumption of global electricity and CO2 emissions will diminish by the year 2027, contrasting with the expectations set forth by the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
Through his tweet, the advocate advocated for truthful and precise research, highlighting the increasing scientific agreement that Bitcoin mining offers substantial environmental advantages. However, Batten cautions that the current IMF report may be misleading and should not be trusted as a credible source for policy decisions.
Read More
- BODEN PREDICTION. BODEN cryptocurrency
- GHST PREDICTION. GHST cryptocurrency
- BETA PREDICTION. BETA cryptocurrency
- STRD PREDICTION. STRD cryptocurrency
- Mango Markets Exploiter Found Guilty Of Fraud And Manipulation
- GBP EUR PREDICTION
- MATIC PREDICTION. MATIC cryptocurrency
- LOOKS PREDICTION. LOOKS cryptocurrency
- BRN/USD
- TNSR PREDICTION. TNSR cryptocurrency
2024-08-15 23:57