As an analyst with extensive experience in political and financial matters, I find Roger Ver’s ongoing legal battle with the U.S. government to be a compelling case study on the intersection of technology, citizenship, and government overreach. The fact that Ver, often hailed as “Bitcoin Jesus,” finds himself in this situation despite his significant contributions to cryptocurrency is particularly intriguing.
On December 6, 2024, political activist and podcast host Charlie Kirk publicly supported Roger Ver, a prominent figure known as the “Bitcoin Jesus” for his early advocacy of Bitcoin, in a discussion about his prolonged legal dispute with the U.S. government. This dispute, seen by many as an instance of overreaching government intervention, has been ongoing for several years in Ver’s case.
On Kirk’s program, Ver was joined by Drew Hernandez and Tracy Thurman, the spokesperson for FreeRogerNow.org, where they discussed Ver’s case. To convey the details without speaking, Ver sat with tape over his mouth that read “censored,” as he was worried that any words he said might be used against him in a court of law.
On the program, Tracy Thurman stated that the U.S. administration alleges Ver failed to pay exit taxes on two occasions: 2014 and 2017. The 2017 accusation is perplexing as Ver had already relinquished his American citizenship by then. This raises a crucial point in this case: if he was no longer a U.S. citizen, why would he still owe U.S. taxes?
Thurman additionally highlighted the illogical nature of the tax system in Ver’s situation. Back in 2014, when Ver was mandated to pay an exit tax, his Bitcoin assets held significant value—a sum that was so large it would have been impractical for him to sell it all at once without causing a market crash.
Comparably, if Ver decided to offload all his Bitcoins simultaneously, it would have led to a significant crash in the Bitcoin market, much like what would happen if everyone in the U.S. attempted to sell their homes on the same day, causing a collapse in the housing market.
As a researcher delving into this matter, I find it’s not merely a tax issue at hand; it encapsulates something much broader. Kirk, an advocate for limiting government interference, underscores the significance of this case as a manifestation of a growing phenomenon known as “lawfare.” In essence, lawfare involves the strategic use of legal systems to neutralize and discredit those who question the actions of the government.
Kirk voiced his backing for Ver’s matter, urging President-elect Trump to intervene and resolve the case. In essence, he suggested a pardon, dismissal of charges, whatever necessary steps, it’s time for a fresh start, and to release Roger, Kirk stated. Moreover, he pointed out that Trump, having gone through similar legal struggles himself, is aware of the distress one feels when the justice system is manipulated for political purposes.
Read More
- We’re Terrible At Organizing Things.’ Tom Holland Reveals The Sweet Holiday Scheme He And Zendaya Are Going To Try Next Year
- Cookie Run Kingdom: Shadow Milk Cookie Toppings and Beascuits guide
- Deva: Shahid Kapoor and Pooja Hegde’s lip-lock scene gets trimmed by CBFC? Film’s runtime and rating revealed
- NewsNation Taps Leland Vittert to Replace Dan Abrams
- Girls Frontline 2 Exilium tier list
- New Era and BEAMS Reunite for Spring/Summer 2025 Collection
- Bill Skarsgard, Murray Bartlett, Noah Jupe Join ‘The Death of Robin Hood’
- Rooster Teeth Is Back and Promises To Go Back to Its Roots
- CBS Shocks Fans with a Bold New Soap Opera After 26 Years!
- BlackRock’s Ethereum ETF $ETHA Listed on DTCC, Awaits Trading
2024-12-07 10:12