Chasing Data In An Omnichain World: Solving Web3’s Infra Problem

by

As a researcher with years of experience navigating the complexities of web3, I can confidently say that accessing web3 data is akin to playing whack-a-mole – just when you think you’ve got it under control, another challenge pops up. The omnichain world is indeed a fascinating one, but it comes with its fair share of challenges, especially when it comes to finding a universal web3 data delivery solution.

Working with web3 data might initially appear simple: You choose your network, initiate a Remote Procedure Call (RPC), and witness the on-chain data stream in. This method usually functions well when you’re handling just one or a few blockchains. However, things can swiftly turn complex once multiple attempts are made.

As a crypto investor navigating the omnichain landscape, I’ve noticed that new networks are popping up at an unprecedented pace, outpacing the ability of infrastructure providers to index them all. This rapid expansion can present unexpected hurdles for projects seeking a universal web3 data delivery solution. The truth is, it’s not as straightforward as it seems. Although many RPC (Remote Procedure Call) providers offer support for multiple chains, very few are capable of encompassing all networks. As a result, the process of incorporating new networks and integrating emerging protocols can feel like a constant game of whack-a-mole, requiring continuous adaptation and problem-solving.

Web3 may not be simple to grasp, but it doesn’t need to be overly complex. However, as you delve deeper into the unique aspects of web3 infrastructure, it can grow increasingly complicated. It’s true that you can create multi-chain applications that gather data from various networks, oracles, and external sources. But keep in mind that this advantage comes with a cost, not just financially, but also in terms of time that could be used more productively elsewhere.

Web3 Isn’t Free

In simpler terms, while Web3 incorporates numerous ideas, it isn’t without its expenses. The continuous operation of distributed nodes, the constant consumption of data, and the running of data centers at maximum capacity all result in ongoing costs. These costs are experienced by users as transaction fees on the network.

For creators of decentralized apps (dApps), regardless if they’re building a player-vs-player game or a DeFi trading instrument, their main costs typically manifest as infrastructure charges, linked to data handling and management.

In the initial phase of a project’s life, data costs tend to be within budget. However, as user numbers increase, along with the number of RPCs (Remote Procedure Calls) needed, things can quickly become overwhelming. Anyone who has worked on backend tasks for a web3 startup is familiar with this scenario: a new blockchain becomes popular, the team decides to add support, and suddenly the rush starts.

As a researcher delving into this particular system, I’m curious about who manages the data streams within the network. Contemplating potential future collaborations or subscriptions, it seems like navigating this swiftly growing ecosystem is much like trying to hit a moving target: each new network necessitates its own service provider, with inconsistent APIs, unpredictable coverage, and mounting operational costs.

Managing dependable blockchain data often feels like the task of Sisyphus, resulting in projects being burdened with a complex web of various service providers, disjointed workflows, and excessive financial and human resource expenses.

The Hidden Cost of Chasing Data

Currently, developers frequently need to assemble a collection of RPC (Remote Procedure Call) providers to establish this connectivity. Each provider caters to specific blockchains, so when a project aims to accommodate a different chain, another provider may be needed, leading to additional integration, management, and monitoring tasks – all requiring dedicated personnel.

One way of rephrasing the sentence in a more natural and easy-to-read manner could be: “Web3 operates using RPCs primarily to ensure that data delivery, just like other crucial infrastructure layers, remains completely decentralized. While obtaining data from centralized APIs is convenient, it also poses a risk for censorship and service disruptions, which contradicts the very principles of cryptocurrency.

One of the significant dilemmas in web3’s continuous hunt for additional data across multiple blockchains is that the drive for decentralization could eventually transform into a centralized system, centered around the supply chain of node operators.

Integrating each new chain takes at least a day’s worth of investigation, training, and trials. We’re reaching a point where multi-chain projects might need a full-time employee whose only responsibility is to monitor, manage, and liaise with multiple data providers. This reliance goes against the principles of web3; if a dedicated worker is responsible for connecting and disconnecting all RPCs (Remote Procedure Calls), it suggests that there’s been a problem.

Let Them Consume Data

As a crypto investor, I’m constantly thinking about the future, especially when it comes to web3 data delivery. I’ve realized that what seems like a minor issue now, could potentially escalate into a significant problem down the line. The RPC (Remote Procedure Call) provider that works well for my current needs might not be up to par as I delve deeper into more complex Layer 2 (L2) and Layer 3 (L3) solutions. Therefore, it’s crucial to plan ahead and choose an RPC provider that can grow with my needs and handle the complexity of these advanced layers.

Consider this process as if you’re selecting a lifelong companion: seek someone who will be there for you, offering support, regardless of the path your journey takes.

Instead of focusing solely on the established top three industry leaders, it might be beneficial to explore agile and dynamic newcomers who are eager to excel. Look for characteristics such as 24/7 customer support, adaptable pricing plans, and a business structure that adapts to your expanding needs. Fortunately, there exist infrastructure providers that embody these qualities.

A fresh generation of infrastructure systems aims to alleviate the complexities associated with managing data. One such system is dRPC, which merges connectivity for numerous blockchains into one comprehensive platform. Instead of dealing with multiple service providers, teams can direct all their data requests through a unified control panel that’s engineered to effortlessly accommodate new networks as they become available online.

A key advantage lies in the fact that projects don’t need to subscribe to a fresh service when extending chain support; instead, the growth occurs automatically within the platform itself, leading to a significant decrease in workload for developers.

With its multi-chain, decentralized structure, dRPC removes the necessity for teams to seek out tailored solutions. This setup guarantees continuous operation, swift block data delivery, and fair distribution of workload, thereby empowering developers to adapt quickly in a dynamic market. dRPC signifies a substantial leap towards the eco-friendly data ecosystem that web3 demands, providing more opportunities for innovation with fewer hurdles.

dRPC is by no means the only company championing this formula, but its model embodies what web3 projects should be looking for – and preferably before, not after, they’ve added 50 chains into the mix.

The Future of Data Delivery

Managing web3 data infrastructure at scale has historically posed difficulties, as the continual integration of fresh blockchains often leaves DevOps teams feeling exasperated. Keeping track of numerous subscriptions, each with its unique pricing structure, adds complexity to usage, invoicing, and node dependability.

As a researcher exploring the realm of decentralized technology, I am convinced that the key to unlocking our potential lies in the development of universal gateways. These gateways are designed to seamlessly incorporate burgeoning blockchains, thereby enhancing interoperability among different systems. This means that integrating new chain connections can be as simple as updating a configuration file, allowing us to devote more time and energy to refining user experience and optimizing cost efficiency.

The success of web3 hinges on its capacity to handle data effortlessly across numerous blockchains. Instead of constantly seeking out new data sources, integration should be as straightforward as installing an update on your software. This change will facilitate the smooth transition towards a unified and decentralized future where data is universally accessible.

Read More

2024-12-20 17:41