As an analyst, I have closely followed the cryptocurrency market for several years now. The recent announcement regarding the EigenLayer airdrop has sparked heated debates among the community, with valid concerns being raised about certain aspects of the plan.
The long-awaited details of the EigenLayer airdrop were revealed, eliciting a mix of praise and intensive examination.
The launch plan includes allocating 45% of the 1.67 billion tokens to the community, with a third of this portion distributed through an airdrop spanning multiple seasons. The initial season will distribute 5% of the tokens in two segments, specifically rewarding those staked with the protocol.
A primary concern is the restriction on token transferability upon release.
As a researcher studying EigenLayer, I would explain that when this token is introduced into circulation, it will initially be unable to be transferred among individuals for several months. This measure has been put in place to facilitate the decentralization process and encourage the development of a strong consensus regarding its value and governance within the community.
Despite this restriction and the distribution of tokens, there has been significant frustration expressed, especially from those who received the airdrop.
As a researcher examining the topic, I’ve observed that the total commitment towards community airdrops in this specific case amounts to 15%. This figure is significantly higher than the industry standard of 10%. Consequently, the criticism suggesting that the team isn’t considering the community doesn’t hold water based on these numbers.
As a crypto investor, I’ve noticed some criticisms regarding the $EIGEN airdrop.
— DavidHoffman.eth/acc🦇🔊 (@TrustlessState) April 29, 2024
The Starknet airdrop controversy from February resonates with the current predicament. Initially, investors and key contributors were supposed to receive their tokens once trading began, marking the end of a one-year vesting period. However, Starknet delayed this distribution following public criticism.
Criticism continued to mount against the airdrop due to its exclusion of countries such as the United States and Canada, and the prohibition of VPN users. The justification given was regulatory concerns. This limitation left some disgruntled users questioning the fairness of platform access compared to airdrop participation.
Furthermore, some have raised questions about the intricacy of the airdrop design and the associated ideas, including intersubjective forking within the context of the Universal Intersubjective Work Token, as outlined in the whitepaper.
As an analyst, I’ve noticed some confusion surrounding the eligibility of Pendle users for the airdrop. At first, it seemed they were excluded from the distribution. However, the Eigen Foundation later clarified that they were indeed included in the airdrop. Despite this clarification, the market response from Pendle has been lukewarm at best. According to CoinGecko, there’s been an 18% drop in price since the announcement.
As an analyst, I’ve noticed that there are widespread concerns about the EigenLayer issue contributing to Ethereum‘s (ETH) current downturn. Notably, there has been a substantial increase in withdrawals from the platform, amounting to approximately 150,000 ETH or $457 million, according to reports from Dune Analytics and DefiLlama.
Read More
- BODEN PREDICTION. BODEN cryptocurrency
- GHST PREDICTION. GHST cryptocurrency
- BETA PREDICTION. BETA cryptocurrency
- STRD PREDICTION. STRD cryptocurrency
- Mango Markets Exploiter Found Guilty Of Fraud And Manipulation
- GBP EUR PREDICTION
- MATIC PREDICTION. MATIC cryptocurrency
- LOOKS PREDICTION. LOOKS cryptocurrency
- BRN/USD
- TNSR PREDICTION. TNSR cryptocurrency
2024-04-30 20:30