As an experienced financial analyst, I’ve followed the evolving regulatory landscape surrounding cryptocurrencies closely. Given the current political climate in Washington D.C., it comes as no surprise that House Democrats are being strongly encouraged, rather than forced, to vote against the two pro-crypto bills up for a floor vote this week: the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century (FIT21) Act and the CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act.
House Democrats in the United States are not compelled but strongly urged to cast votes opposing two pro-cryptocurrency bills scheduled for a floor vote this week.
In a leaked email obtained by POLITICO, party leaders did not urge their members to take a stance against the Republican-proposed Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century (FIT21) Act and the CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act.
FIT21 proposes to bring clarity to the categorization of cryptocurrencies and transfer regulatory oversight to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). This initiative is backed by 60 companies, who have signed a letter advocating for its approval.
Yet, Reps. Maxine Waters and David Scott express their opposition to FIT21, with Waters additionally voicing her dissent towards the CBDC Act. Critics among Democratic ranks argue that FIT21 could jeopardize existing legal frameworks and erode investor safeguards.
The CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act is intended to prevent the Federal Reserve from releasing a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). However, Democrats express concern that this legislation might weaken the dollar’s dominance in global transactions. A debate and vote on this matter by the Financial Services and Innovation Technology Committee (FIT21) are projected for May 22.
As a seasoned analyst, I can tell you that this latest congressional development serves to highlight the persistent debate and discord among lawmakers regarding the regulation of cryptocurrencies.
Read More
Sorry. No data so far.
2024-05-21 08:04