Recently, OP_CAT introduced a new proposal called BIP-420 in the ongoing Bitcoin community debate about covenants.
Udi Wertheimer, a proponent of OP_CAT as presented on X, explains that this suggestion intends to introduce covenants to Bitcoin. This addition could lead to various possibilities such as smart contracts, secure connections between blockchains, on-chain transactions, and zero-knowledge proof verification among others. Nevertheless, it is important to mention that the proposal has not been endorsed as a formal Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) at this time.
In simpler terms, covenants on Bitcoin function as advanced instructions for the use of Bitcoins in future transactions. These instructions outline particular conditions that must be met before the Bitcoins can be spent again.
Covenants offer diverse applications, ranging from establishing safe deposit boxes for transaction rollbacks to setting up automatic recurring payments, delayed transfers for legacy purposes, and intricate financial tools such as escrow accounts and bonds.
Initially, OP_CAT was incorporated into Bitcoin’s initial set of opcodes but was later deactivated by Satoshi Nakamoto in 2010 due to safety concerns. An opcode refers to a command used in Bitcoin’s scripting language to carry out functions within scripts.
Today marks an exciting milestone: the OP_CAT proposal has officially been given a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal number – enter BIP-420! With this development, bitcoin will gain the ability to support covenants. In simpler terms, BIP-420 enables the creation of contracts and secure linkages between different transactions on the blockchain. This new feature paves the way for advanced functionalities such as smart contracts and on-chain constructions.— Udi | BIP-420 🐱 (@udiWertheimer) April 22, 2024
Ethan Heilman and Armin Sabouri’s proposal suggests bringing back OP_CAT through a soft fork that is backward-compatible. They plan to accomplish this by redefining the opcode OP_SUCCESS126, which helps reduce confusion by keeping the original opcode value.
Supporters believe introducing OP_CAT back into Bitcoin would boost its functions, make decentralized procedures more streamlined, allow for complex multi-signature arrangements, and increase the cryptocurrency’s scripting abilities and adaptability.
Although implementing an OP_CAT soft fork depends on the technical possibility, ensuring security, and gaining community agreement.
In addition to OP_CAT, various other Bitcoin covenant proposals are being discussed. Each proposal comes with its distinct methodology and potential advantages and disadvantages. Some of these proposals include Check Template Verify (CTV), OP_CHECKSIGFROMSTACK (CSFS), and LNHANCE. CTV and CSFS provide alternative ways to verify signatures, while LNHANCE focuses on enhancing the Lightning Network. Each proposal presents unique functionalities and levels of formality in their approaches.
Read More
Sorry. No data so far.
2024-04-23 20:16