On April 2nd, the Core Team at Sushi introduced a significant proposal. If approved, this would mark the most substantial shift in the Sushi Ecosystem since its beginning. This proposal is now being considered by the Sushi Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO), and the response has been generally positive.
The objective of this vote is to shift Sushi’s operational model to align more closely with other thriving Decentralized Exchange (DEX) platforms. This change will bring about improvements in fundraising methods, technology advancements, and the overall framework for Sushi. People are accustomed to the achievements of these successful platforms in their deployment and crowdfunding initiatives.
So far, this Sushi vote has generated the greatest level of engagement among any previous votes. The reason for this heightened interest is likely because of the significant modifications that are up for consideration. In an interview with Crypto Daily, the Sushi Head Chef expressed optimism towards these changes, sharing, “We’re really excited about these proposals.”
For an extended duration, we’ve held discussions with the Sushi Community. It’s evident they aim to stay competitive within the market.
The formation of a new Labs Company is indicated by the specifics of the latest model. This involves the transfer of our current key team members to this fresh organization. Subsequently, the DAO will gain additional features like multiple councils, governance boards, and enhanced control over DEX operations through more substantial governance votes.
Not everyone seemed impressed. One user knows as ‘Naim’ seems to have hounded both Twitter and Sushi Wallet holders with an overall different version of events. They claim that the movement is a ‘rug pull’ by the Sushi Core team (specifically the Head Chef). When asked about this, Jared responded
“What you’re saying isn’t accurate. In fact, we aim to make the DAO and DEX even more decentralized through their deployment. We’re shifting our efforts to Sushi Labs to develop technology that can be integrated into the Sushi platform.”
When asked specifically about the ‘rug pull’ Jared responded –
The core team is clueless about the origin of that idea. Fortunately, due to the involvement of wallet signatories who aren’t part of our core team, it becomes highly challenging for anyone to deceive or manipulate Sushi in a malicious way.
In our proposal, we requested financing to set up Labs using monies accumulated by Sushi over the past few years. This does not signify a significant portion of the overall treasury.
It seems that Naim, who goes by the name “BrutalTrade” on Twitter and was once a team member of Sushi, may have hidden reasons for their strong opposition to the vote. Their social media posts on X (formerly Twitter) lack substance and primarily consist of unfounded criticisms or misconstrued information regarding the Head Chef and Sushi.
‘There doesn’t seem to be any evidence of a rug pull’ – one X (formerly Twitter) user commented.
It’s reasonable for former members of Sushi to feel disappointed if they missed out on this chance. However, attempting to sabotage its progress for the sake of all others involved isn’t an appropriate response.
Based on the feedback and reactions from users on the forum, there is a generally favorable sentiment towards the changes. As the vote continues, it remains intriguing to anticipate what lies ahead for Sushi.
Read More
Sorry. No data so far.
2024-04-09 19:24