Transak vs MoonPay: Which Crypto Payments Gateway Is Best For Your dApp?

by

In summary, when comparing Transak and MoonPay as crypto gateways for developers integrating web3 applications, several key differences emerge. Here’s a brief comparison based on the provided criteria:

Modern Web3 programmers understand the significance of incorporating a fiat entry point into their decentralized applications (dApps). This integration allows users to easily acquire the necessary cryptocurrency for dApp usage, thereby streamlining the onboarding experience for newcomers.

Offering a seamless method for purchasing and exchanging cryptocurrencies within a platform brings convenience to users, as they can avoid the need to navigate to external websites or services to acquire the necessary digital assets for using a decentralized application (dApp).

As a researcher studying user experience in Web3 games, I’ve discovered that one major pain point for new players is having to navigate outside platforms to purchase in-game currency for weapon upgrades. This additional step can be a significant barrier to entry and may even lead some players to abandon the game altogether. To address this issue, I strongly recommend integrating a seamless in-game purchasing system that allows users to buy tokens directly within the platform with just a few simple clicks. By doing so, we can enhance the overall user experience and increase the likelihood of player engagement and retention.

In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the usage and popularity of crypto on-ramps. For Web3 to reach a wider audience and become mainstream, user experience (UX) plays a pivotal role – and on-ramps are key elements, spearheading the UX innovation at the entrance to Web3.

As a crypto market analyst, based on the latest data from SimilarWeb, I can confirm that Transak and MoonPay are currently the go-to platforms for crypto on-ramps. These platforms cater extensively to new users joining the Web3 scene, providing them with an abundance of payment options and supporting various cryptocurrencies.

 

What Is Transak?

Transak is a leading Web3 payments company, introducing an advanced crypto buying and selling infrastructure in the industry. With a user-friendly onboarding process, Transak enables simple transactions directly through its native widget or from over 400 integrated dApps.

This platform facilitates cryptocurrency buying on widely used wallets like MetaMask, Trust Wallet, and Exodus. It also connects with renowned Decentralized Finance (DeFi) applications such as Aave.

As a crypto investor, I’m always on the lookout for convenient and versatile ways to buy and sell digital assets. That’s why I find Transak’s extensive range of payment options so appealing. With support for bank transfers, credit and debit cards, various digital wallets, and over 20 localized solutions like PIX, UPI, and SPEI, this platform caters to a wide range of users around the world.

 

What Is MoonPay? 

As a researcher studying the crypto marketplace, I’ve come across platforms like Transak and MoonPay that aim to streamline the experience of purchasing and selling cryptocurrencies. With over hundred integrations into popular decentralized applications (dApps), these platforms have gained significant traction in the industry.

As a crypto investor, I find MoonPay to be an invaluable tool for my investment needs. With this platform, I can easily purchase a diverse range of cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Cardano, USDCoin, USD Tether, and many more, totalling over 75 options. Additionally, MoonPay supports transactions in more than 30 fiat currencies, making it accessible to investors across 160+ countries worldwide.

A diverse range of accepted payment methods is available, encompassing options such as bank transfers, bank wires, credit and debit cards, Apple Pay, and Google Pay – these being the most frequently chosen by our users.

 

Which Crypto On-Ramp Is Best?

As an analyst, I would approach this comparison between Transak and MoonPay by acknowledging the initial similarities that might draw a developer’s attention. However, it is essential to understand the subtle differences between these two platforms to make an informed decision.

As a crypto investor, I’ve noticed that both platforms have unique features that set them apart, even if the differences might not be immediately apparent. For instance, the functions each platform offers and the variety of fiat currencies they accept are crucial factors for businesses considering integration.

To effectively cater to your user base, developers should take into account the geographical location of their audience and the preferred payment options and currencies they use. By carefully considering these aspects, developers can identify the most suitable platform for achieving their business objectives.

As a researcher exploring the payment processing solutions landscape, I’d like to shed light on the essential differences between Transak and MoonPay. Both platforms offer developers convenient ways to integrate payment functionality into their applications, but they have unique features that may influence your choice. Let’s delve deeper into these distinctions to help you make an informed decision based on your specific project requirements.

 

Supported Cryptocurrencies

When selecting a crypto gateway for your dApp, it’s essential to consider the specific cryptocurrencies it supports, as integrating a gateway that doesn’t enable users to buy the required tokens renders it ineffective.

Among the top crypto on-ramp platforms, Transak and MoonPay stand out for their extensive lists of supported cryptocurrencies. However, a closer look at their respective product documents reveals that Transak provides a more comprehensive selection.

As an analyst, I have reviewed Transak’s website and found that they currently support 173 different cryptocurrencies, including major tokens and some less-known ones. On the other hand, I examined MoonPay’s documentation carefully and identified a total of 123 digital assets that they presently support.

As a researcher examining the current state of these two services, I can confidently say that Transak holds an edge over its competitor in terms of the number of listed tokens. However, this advantage may shift as both platforms continue to expand their offerings and potentially delist certain tokens.

 

Supported Fiat Currencies

When selecting a development platform, developers need to take into account the types of currencies it accommodates. This is crucial since using a platform that does not support the local currency for your intended audience could limit your reach and impact.

As a currency analysis specialist, I’ve noticed that Transak stands out among its competitors once more. With a total of 76 supported fiat currencies under its belt, it surpasses MoonPay’s current offerings of 34 options.

 

On-Ramp Payment Methods

Users preferably seek ample options for fiat payment methods when purchasing crypto. Fortunately, both platforms provide common choices like credit cards and debit cards (including MasterCard, Visa, and Maestro), in addition to renowned digital wallet services such as Google Pay, Apple Pay, and SEPA, along with its instant version.

MoonPay is unique in offering PayPal as an option, making it appealing to some users. However, its range of accepted payment methods falls short when compared to Transak’s 17 options. In essence, MoonPay currently supports only eight different ways to make a transaction.

 

Off-Ramp Payment Methods

Users seek the flexibility to both purchase and offload their cryptocurrencies should they realize a gain through trading activities or participating in NFT games.

As an analyst, I’ve compared the payout methods supported by both MoonPay and Transak. While both platforms have a more limited number of options, MoonPay stands out with five supported payout methods: debit cards, ACH payments, SEPA & SEPA Instant, UK Faster Payments, and PayPal. Transak, on the other hand, offers seven payout choices, but it’s essential to note that debit cards are distinguished based on the selected currency. When counting all supported debit cards as one option, Transak provides three distinct methods for payouts: SEPA & SEPA Instant, and Faster Bank Transfer.

That said, Transak claims an advantage in that all of its payouts are deposited with user’s accounts instantly, whereas MoonPay only supports instant payouts for PayPal and SEPA Instant, with other methods taking 1-3 days to process.

 

Supported Regions

As an analyst, I’ve noticed that Transak has a wider reach when it comes to supporting countries for fiat-to-crypto and crypto-to-fiat swaps. Specifically, their website indicates that they can serve 169 territories in total. In contrast, MoonPay’s coverage extends to 158 countries, as determined by their list of unsupported nations.

 

Product Diversity

MoonPay distinguishes itself from Transak in terms of features with its comprehensive offerings going beyond just a crypto on- and off-ramp. MoonPay provides an NFT Checkout, Web3 Passport, and HyperMint platform for creating non-fungible tokens. Transak too presents an NFT Checkout and the innovative product Transak One, simplifying and consolidating intricate fiat-to-smart contract interactions. With Transak One, users can stake, bridge liquidity, and participate in various DeFi transactions using fiat, all without the need for a prior exchange.

 

KYC Processes

The KYC (Know Your Customer) procedure isn’t particularly beloved by crypto fans, yet it’s essential for getting started with this digital currency world. Traditional financial organizations must adhere to stringent rules regarding whom they can transact with, hence the need for thorough identity verification procedures like KYC.

Transak attempts to streamline this process as much as possible with its multi-level KYC solution. 

For newcomers, simply supplying a name and billing address is sufficient to clear the initial verification stage and enable small transactions, such as in the case of blockchain games. The next phase, level two, necessitates providing proof of identity and address, along with passing a liveness test, allowing for transactions up to $20,000. Users seeking unrestricted account access must go through the comprehensive KYC process at level three, involving more intricate verification checks.

As an analyst, I would describe MoonPay’s KYC (Know Your Customer) process in the following way: MoonPay breaks down its customer identification procedure into four primary components. The first step is an identity verification, where users are required to provide personal information for confirmation. Next, they need to submit proof of their residential address. Following that, a selfie is requested for facial recognition purposes. Lastly, there’s the “source of wealth” validation phase, which entails users submitting documents demonstrating their income sources.

With Transak, users can complete all necessary verifications at once before making a transaction. In contrast, MoonPay’s process is incremental. This means that as users approach each transaction limit, they will be required to submit further documentation for verification.

 

dApp Integration

As a researcher focusing on crypto development, I recognize the importance of seamless integration of any cryptocurrency gateway into my project. Luckily, I can rely on Transak and MoonPay for this task, as they offer extensive APIs that simplify the integration process.

As a crypto investor using Transak’s platform, I can take advantage of various integration methods to seamlessly incorporate cryptocurrency payments into my applications. Transak offers an Instant Checkout SDK for quick and easy transactions. For those developing with React Native, there is a dedicated SDK available. Additionally, Reach Native can be integrated through Webview. Moreover, there are APIs for Android, iOS, and White Label solutions to cater to diverse development needs. Lastly, even developers facing implementation challenges can use a simple redirect link to get started.

As a crypto investor, I appreciate MoonPay’s flexibility when it comes to integrating their payment solution into my projects. They offer six different SDKs: Web, React, Node.js for web applications, and iOS, Android, and React Native for mobile applications. While I recommend using one of these options for seamless integration, I understand that some technology stacks may not be compatible. In such cases, MoonPay provides a simple URL-based integration, which redirects users to a MoonPay widget within my decentralized application (dApp).

 

Transaction Fees 

The fees for transactions on different platforms can significantly differ, depending on the chosen payment method, the involved fiat currency, and user location. Among these options, Transak seems to offer a slight edge with its fee structure. Transak’s fees range from 0.99% up to more than 5%. In comparison, MoonPay’s fees are also variable but may be slightly higher in some cases. However, it is important to note that Transak imposes higher minimums for fiat currency withdrawals.

MoonPay imposes a fee of 4.5% per transaction, which is relatively high, or a minimum charge of $5. Consequently, although MoonPay supports smaller transactions, processing small monetary values results in significant costs.

 

Affiliate Programs

Transak and MoonPay provide affiliate schemes, enabling developers to recommend other Web3 creators to these platforms and receive compensation based on each transaction made by the referred parties.

MoonPay allows developers to earn a variable commission of 0.5% to 1.25% on each transaction. Users have the freedom to change this percentage. MoonPay is open to collaborating with affiliates to identify the best commission structure for maximizing conversions. Once affiliate earnings reach $1,000 or its equivalent in local currency, commissions can be withdrawn using Bitcoin (BTC), USD Coin (USDC), or Tether (USDT).

Transak maintains a lower level of transparency regarding affiliate referrals, yet provides a set commission for each completed transaction. Additionally, affiliates receive comprehensive instruction and assistance. Furthermore, they have the ability to provide discounts on select tokens for their customers.

 

User Reviews

A large number of Transak users have expressed their contentment with the platform, praising its straightforward design, user-friendliness, and swift transaction processing. However, it’s important to note that some users have voiced concerns about delayed transactions and encountered challenges when sending or receiving Ethereum. Despite these issues, Transak boasts an impressive 4.2-star rating on Trustpilot based on more than 22,000 reviews, with a significant number of positive experiences overshadowing the negative ones.

Regarding MoonPay, this company has amassed over 86,000 reviews on Trustpilot, achieving a commendable average rating of 4.1 stars. A significant number of users have praised its user-friendly interface and expressed their contentment with the service. However, some users have mentioned feeling perplexed by certain features and found the KYC process to be time-consuming. Despite these minor concerns, a large proportion of users remain pleased with MoonPay’s offerings.

 

Comparison Summary

 

Criteria

Transak

MoonPay

Winner

Supported Cryptocurrencies

173

123

Transak

Supported Fiat Currencies

76

34

Transak

On-Ramp Methods

17

8

Transak

Off-Ramp Methods

3

5

MoonPay

Supported Regions

169

158

Transak

Product Diversity

3

5

MoonPay

KYC Processes

Flexible

Incremental

Transak

Transaction Fees

Starts at 0.99%

4.5%

Transak

Affiliate Program

Less transparent

0.5% to 1.25%

MoonPay

User Reviews on Trustpilot

4.2/5

4.1/5

Transak

*Numbers accurate as of June 2024

 

Conclusion

From a crypto investor’s perspective, comparing Transak and MoonPay side by side uncovers distinct advantages and drawbacks for each platform, making it a tough call to declare a definitive champion. Nevertheless, Transak sets itself apart with features that cater to a wider range of users, including developers and businesses, making it an attractive choice for those seeking versatility in their crypto transactions.

Transak’s ability to adapt and prioritize user needs makes it an ideal choice for addressing various requirements. Developers must consider elements like the accepted payment methods, token compatibility, and transaction fees when making their selection. Transak stands out with its affordable pricing and reliable support, establishing itself as a formidable contender in these aspects.

As a crypto investor, I’ve carefully analyzed both Transak and its competitor’s offerings. It’s clear to me that Transak provides a versatile solution ideal for users who value ease of use and flexibility when interacting with decentralized applications (dApps).

Read More

2024-06-05 14:41