As a seasoned crypto investor with over a decade of experience in this volatile and intriguing digital frontier, I can’t help but feel a sense of relief and closure following the latest UK Court of Appeal ruling dismissing Craig Wright’s claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto. The cryptocurrency community has been entangled in this drawn-out saga for far too long, with skepticism and doubt clouding the identity of Bitcoin’s creator since its inception.
In simpler terms, the Court of Appeal in the United Kingdom has rejected Craig Wright’s effort to contest a previous decision made by the High Court stating that he is not the anonymous inventor of Bitcoin, known as Satoshi Nakamoto.
As a crypto investor, I learned on November 29th from Hodlonaut, a notable figure in the Bitcoin community, that Craig Wright’s plea for approval was emphatically turned down. The court determined that Wright had made false assertions about his identity as Nakamoto, with suspicions that some of his arguments might have been fabricated using artificial intelligence.
This decision conclusively denies Wright’s ongoing legal attempts to establish himself as the creator of Bitcoin, thereby marking the end of a contentious period in the annals of cryptocurrency history.
According to a recent decision by the UK Court of Appeal, Craig Wright was reprimanded for submitting numerous untruths during his appeal. Some of the sources he provided were labeled as fictional, while others were described as “artificial intelligence-inspired delusions.
One instance pointed out was the case Anderson v The Queen [2013] UKPC 2, which the court deemed as questionable and seemingly fictitious. Furthermore, the court underlined that Wright’s appeal lacked any chance of prevailing, and there was no substantial justification for considering it.
Craig Wright, born in 1970, is an Australian computer expert and entrepreneur who has maintained since at least 2016 that he is the inventor of Bitcoin under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto. However, his assertions have faced skepticism within the cryptocurrency community, with individuals such as Hodlonaut labeling him a ‘deceiver’ and a ‘fraud.’
Known as “Faketoshi” on Bitcoin forums, Wright has persisted in taking legal action against those who have criticized him, filing defamation cases against individuals such as Hodlonaut, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin, Adam Back, podcaster Peter McCormack, and others. However, many of these lawsuits have resulted in defeat or dismissal, adding to the ongoing debate about his true identity.
Last May, Judge James Mellor from the UK High Court determined that Craig Wright was not indeed Satoshi Nakamoto. This court case was initiated by the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA), a consortium of businesses who alleged that Wright falsified evidence to bolster his assertion.
The decision solidified the understanding that Wright is not the inventor of Bitcoin, which has prompted more extensive inquiries from researchers and reporters to reveal Nakamoto’s real persona.
In October, a documentary on HBO proposed the possibility that Canadian Bitcoin programmer Peter Todd might be Satoshi Nakamoto, the anonymous creator of Bitcoin. Yet, Mr. Todd openly refuted this theory, leaving many in the cryptocurrency world uncertain and doubtful about this assumption.
Read More
- AI16Z PREDICTION. AI16Z cryptocurrency
- POL PREDICTION. POL cryptocurrency
- Crypto ETPs hit $44.5b in YTD inflows amid Bitcoin surge
- Hong Kong Treasury says crypto is not a ‘target asset’ for its Exchange Fund
- Li Haslett Chen to Leave Warner Bros. Discovery Board
- SEN PREDICTION. SEN cryptocurrency
- Blockaid new dashboard to track Web3 activity and threats
- Kakele Online unleashes its biggest update yet with the Orcs of Walfendah
- Shiba Inu, Bonk, Pepe prices rebound: Beware of dead cat bounce
- Springfield man is convicted for using crypto to finance ISIS operations
2024-11-29 20:20